New cash-driven strategies being used for the 2016 election are considered to be not good for democracy.

Money involved in the game is mind-boggling. But in order to understand the transformation of politics example of the recent planning of Republican ex-Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida can be discussed. From his actions, it seems that he wants to maximize the political money in his side.

What an irony it is that at one hand he is denying taking a decision on whether or not to seek the White House in 2016 and one the other he has been organizing political fundraisers, giving speeches and hiring advisers for months.

His entire campaign is based on the new rules that allow candidates to raise funds, mind it without any limit, for PACs, political action committees. The committees can raise and spend money in support or against candidates without revealing who is behind the action.

It can be seen that Bush has been raising money for a super PAC known as Right to Rise. It is said that the PAC has raised $100 million that most likely will be spent to help likely candidate Bush and attacking his competitors.

Not only Bush, it is said that virtually almost every Republican candidate, including Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, Sen. Rand Paul, ex-Sen. Rick Santorum and Dr. Ben Carson have been associated with one super PAC or another.

On the other side are Democrats, like Hilary Clinton has asked for strong campaign finance limits. Now there is a catch that PACs cannot be coordinated with campaigns after a candidate has officially declared he or she is contesting elections. Also, it is clear on what an official candidate can do for his or her PAC.

One of the main problems with the system is it encourages a kind of dishonesty by candidates.