Bajaj Finserv Share Price Declines 6% after Quarterly Results; Stock Weak on Technical Charts

Bajaj Finserv Share Price Declines 6% after Quarterly Results; Stock Weak on Technical Charts

Bajaj Finserv share price opened negative after quarterly results. The stock was down by 6 percent and touched intraday low at Rs 1,926.5 (at the time of publication of this report). Bajaj Finserv has witnessed selling from yearly highs at Rs 2,135. Over the last five days, Bajaj Finserv has declined 7.2 percent. Currently, the stock is looking weak on technical charts. If the stock recovers from the lows, investors might need to again evaluate technical levels for Bajaj Finserv. The stock might need a couple of trading sessions for investors to digest signals of a slowing credit environment, rising non-performing assets (NPAs), regulatory overhangs in the insurance business, and increased market volatility. Although the company posted a healthy year-on-year rise in consolidated profit, concerns about provisioning, asset quality, and accounting complexities in insurance segments have tempered optimism. With macroeconomic and regulatory challenges looming, the company’s ability to navigate uncertainty while preserving profitability is under close market watch.

Q4 Earnings Prompt Caution Despite Profit Growth

Bajaj Finserv reported a 14% year-on-year increase in profit after tax (PAT), reaching Rs. 2,417 crore for Q4FY25, compared to Rs. 2,119 crore in the same quarter of the previous fiscal. However, the market reaction has been cautious, with the stock sliding nearly 6% in early trading following the results announcement.

The performance of the insurance subsidiaries added complexity to the overall earnings picture, primarily due to accounting decisions regarding mark-to-market (MTM) treatment. While the subsidiaries recorded gains from equity investments held under Fair Value Through Profit and Loss (FVTPL), investments under the Fair Value Through Other Comprehensive Income (FVTOCI) classification did not impact reported profits directly—introducing some disconnect between portfolio performance and bottom-line impact.

Credit Growth Slowdown Weighs on Market Sentiment

The earnings call and disclosures highlighted a broad-based deceleration in credit growth, which analysts believe is weighing heavily on investor sentiment. Amid a high-interest rate environment and cautious lending behavior, Bajaj Finserv's financial services arms have faced hurdles in scaling disbursals at the desired pace.

This moderation in credit activity is seen not only as a short-term operational headwind but also as a reflection of larger systemic factors—rising interest rates, tighter liquidity conditions, and a more cautious consumer sentiment landscape.

Rising NPAs Erode Lending Confidence

Perhaps the most significant concern is the uptick in credit risk across the company’s lending verticals. Bajaj Finance, a key subsidiary, reported elevated losses in Q4, driven by a provisioning spike of Rs. 359 crore for anticipated credit losses. This increase in provisions is attributed to a redevelopment of credit models during the quarter, which appears to have flagged a higher probability of defaults within the loan book.

Net NPAs for both Bajaj Finance and Bajaj Housing Finance came in higher sequentially. More troubling is the performance of Stage 2 and Stage 3 assets (indicators of early and severe delinquencies), which also showed an upward trend—indicating that credit stress may persist beyond one-off factors.

Annualized loan losses as a percentage of average assets under management (AUM) have widened considerably for Bajaj Finance, underscoring a tangible deterioration in asset quality.

Insurance Business Faces Accounting and Regulatory Pressure

On the insurance front, Bajaj Finserv's subsidiaries are dealing with multiple structural and regulatory changes. Notably, there is rising investor unease around new surrender regulations affecting the life insurance segment. These rules impact how surrender charges are calculated and may alter profitability metrics, particularly in long-term policy contracts.

Further, the shift in accounting methodologies within the general insurance industry—particularly with respect to long-term policies—is expected to introduce short-term volatility in reported figures. As these adjustments play out, the variance between cash flows and reported earnings may challenge analyst interpretations and projections.

Market Volatility Adds to Operating Uncertainty

Beyond internal metrics, Bajaj Finserv’s exposure to equity market performance has created an additional layer of earnings volatility. Unrealised mark-to-market (MTM) movements on the equity portfolio held under FVTPL directly affect quarterly performance, while gains on FVTOCI holdings bypass the Profit and Loss Account altogether. This can distort the underlying profitability picture, especially during periods of heightened market volatility.

With equity markets exhibiting increased swings in recent months, such exposure can materially affect financial results even in the absence of fundamental operational changes.

Strategic Response and Market Implications

In response to these mounting pressures, Bajaj Finserv may need to take calibrated measures to:

Strengthen underwriting standards and tighten collection frameworks to arrest further deterioration in NPAs.

Increase transparency around insurance portfolio accounting to help investors reconcile reported and actual investment performance.

Rebalance credit growth ambitions in light of macroeconomic constraints, without sacrificing portfolio quality.

Despite the temporary earnings growth, the market appears focused on long-term challenges, especially in an environment where credit discipline and regulatory adaptability have become essential for sustained value creation.

Bottomline: Navigating a More Complex Financial Landscape

Bajaj Finserv’s Q4FY25 results encapsulate a larger theme in India’s financial services sector: the balancing act between growth, risk, and regulatory alignment. While profit expansion signals operational resilience, elevated NPAs and accounting complexities have put pressure on market valuations.

General: 
Companies: 
Regions: