E2E Transportation Launches IPO, Sets the Stage for Public Market Entry Eknath Deshpande Sat, 27 Dec 2025 - 15:23

IndiGo Hit With Rs. 13 Lakh GST Penalty, Raises Compliance Questions Gurjot Singh Sat, 27 Dec 2025 - 15:22

India’s Forex Reserves Climb to USD 693 Billion, Reinforcing External Stability Binnypriya Singh Sat, 27 Dec 2025 - 15:20

NCCF Begins Subsidized Onion Sales at Rs. 19 per kg Across Delhi-NCR Eknath Deshpande Sat, 27 Dec 2025 - 15:18

Vedanta Shares Touch 52-Week Peak as Strong Fundamentals Drive 35% Annual Surge Gurjot Singh Sat, 27 Dec 2025 - 15:17

Indian Equity Markets Retreat as Sensex and Nifty Slip Amid Investor Caution Ricky Tandon Sat, 27 Dec 2025 - 15:16

Coforge’s $2.35 Billion Encora Buyout Signals a New Phase of Scale and Ambition Eknath Deshpande Sat, 27 Dec 2025 - 15:13

Renault Signals January Price Increase Across Its Vehicle Portfolio Binnypriya Singh Sat, 27 Dec 2025 - 15:11

Bhutan has taken a significant step into digital finance by launching a sovereign gold-backed token developed on the Solana blockchain. The initiative blends traditional asset security with modern blockchain efficiency, positioning the Himalayan kingdom at the forefront of state-led digital asset innovation. Backed by physical gold reserves, the token is designed to offer price stability, transparency, and faster settlement while maintaining sovereign oversight. The move reflects Bhutan’s cautious but forward-looking approach to financial modernization, leveraging blockchain technology to diversify reserve management tools, enhance monetary resilience, and explore new avenues for digital economic participation.

A Strategic Entry Into Digital Asset Innovation

Bhutan’s introduction of a gold-backed digital token marks a rare example of a sovereign government deploying blockchain technology for asset-backed financial instruments. Unlike speculative cryptocurrencies, the token is anchored to tangible gold reserves, reinforcing trust and mitigating volatility.

Officials familiar with the project

describe it as an extension of Bhutan’s broader strategy to explore digital finance without compromising financial stability. By retaining sovereign control over issuance and backing, the initiative distinguishes itself from privately issued stablecoins.

Why Gold and Why Blockchain

Gold has long served as a trusted store of value, particularly for central banks and sovereign institutions. By tokenizing gold reserves, Bhutan aims to combine the stability of a traditional asset with the operational efficiency of blockchain-based settlement.

The Solana blockchain was selected for its high transaction throughput and low processing costs, making it suitable for scalable financial applications. The technology allows for near-instant settlement and transparent verification, features that are increasingly valued in modern financial systems.

Implications for Monetary Strategy and Reserves

The gold-backed token introduces a new dimension to Bhutan’s reserve management framework. While not positioned as a replacement for fiat currency, the token could function as a complementary financial instrument, supporting liquidity management and cross-border transactions.

Economists note that asset-backed digital tokens may offer smaller economies greater flexibility in managing reserves, particularly in an era of global financial fragmentation. The initiative could also reduce reliance on intermediaries in international settlements.

Governance, Transparency, and Risk Controls

Sovereign oversight remains central to the project’s design. Issuance volumes are tied directly to verified gold holdings, with mechanisms in place to prevent over-circulation. Blockchain-based transparency enables real-time auditing, strengthening accountability and public confidence.

Cybersecurity and operational resilience are also reported to be key priorities, reflecting lessons learned from past digital asset failures globally. By embedding controls at the protocol and governance levels, Bhutan aims to balance innovation with prudence.
Regional and Global Significance
Bhutan’s move places it among a small but growing group of nations experimenting with blockchain-backed sovereign instruments. While larger economies continue to debate central bank digital currencies, Bhutan’s gold-backed model offers an alternative path rooted in asset security rather than pure fiat digitization.

The development may draw attention from other emerging economies seeking credible, low-risk ways to adopt blockchain technology without exposing their financial systems to excessive volatility.

A Measured Step Toward the Future

Bhutan’s launch of a gold-backed token underscores a philosophy of selective innovation—embracing technological advancement while anchoring it in time-tested financial principles. Rather than chasing speculative trends, the country is positioning blockchain as a tool for stability, transparency, and long-term resilience.

As global finance evolves, Bhutan’s experiment may serve as a reference point for how sovereign digital assets can be introduced thoughtfully, with discipline and strategic intent.

Dogecoin’s evolution in 2025 marked a turning point for the once-joke cryptocurrency as it gained visibility in both political discourse and commercial adoption. What began as a meme-driven digital asset increasingly found relevance in payment systems, brand partnerships, and public debate around digital finance. While price volatility remained a defining feature, Dogecoin’s cultural reach expanded beyond online communities into mainstream conversation. The year underscored a broader shift in the crypto ecosystem, where social influence, utility, and narrative began to matter as much as technological design. For Dogecoin, 2025 was less about speculation and more about legitimacy.

From Internet Meme to Public Discourse

Dogecoin’s origins as a satirical alternative to Bitcoin have long shaped its identity. In 2025, however, the token crossed an important threshold by entering political conversations around digital assets and financial inclusion.
Public figures referenced Dogecoin in debates about monetary innovation and grassroots finance, reflecting its broad name recognition. While it was rarely positioned as a policy solution, its inclusion in mainstream discussions highlighted the growing influence of community-driven cryptocurrencies in shaping public sentiment.

Commercial Acceptance Gains Momentum

Beyond politics, Dogecoin made measurable inroads into commerce during the year. A growing number of merchants experimented with DOGE as a payment option, attracted by its low transaction costs and strong brand familiarity.

Retail and digital service providers leveraged Dogecoin’s popularity as a marketing tool, using acceptance announcements to engage younger, tech-savvy consumers. Although transaction volumes remained modest compared with established payment networks, the trend signaled increasing comfort with alternative digital currencies in everyday use.

Market Performance and Investor Behavior

From a market perspective, Dogecoin continued to exhibit sharp price swings in 2025, driven largely by sentiment and social media influence rather than fundamental valuation metrics. This volatility reinforced its reputation as a high-risk asset, particularly for short-term traders.

At the same time, a core group of long-term holders remained committed, viewing Dogecoin’s cultural relevance as a form of intangible value. Analysts observed that DOGE’s market behavior increasingly reflected narrative-driven investing rather than traditional crypto market cycles.

Institutional and Regulatory Attention

Dogecoin’s heightened visibility did not go unnoticed by regulators and institutional observers. As discussions around consumer protection and market transparency intensified, DOGE was increasingly cited as an example of how retail-driven assets can influence financial markets.

While no targeted regulatory actions emerged specifically against Dogecoin, its prominence reinforced calls for clearer rules governing digital assets with large retail followings. This attention added another layer of legitimacy, even as it introduced new compliance considerations for platforms supporting the token.

Cultural Influence as a Competitive Advantage

Unlike many cryptocurrencies that compete on technological features, Dogecoin’s strength in 2025 lay in its cultural resonance. Its approachable branding and active community allowed it to remain relevant even as newer, more technically advanced tokens entered the market.

This cultural capital proved valuable in commercial partnerships and public engagement, suggesting that emotional connection can be a durable asset in the digital economy.

Looking Ahead
Dogecoin’s journey through 2025 demonstrated that relevance in the crypto market is no longer defined solely by code or consensus mechanisms. By embedding itself in political conversation and commercial experimentation, DOGE carved out a unique position at the intersection of finance, culture, and public discourse.

Whether this momentum translates into long-term financial stability remains uncertain. What is clear is that 2025 reshaped Dogecoin’s narrative, moving it beyond novelty toward a more complex, and more consequential, role in the digital asset ecosystem.

Prominent market commentator Jim Cramer has declared a fully bearish outlook on Bitcoin, marking a notable shift in sentiment toward the world’s largest cryptocurrency. His stance reflects growing concerns over regulatory pressure, macroeconomic uncertainty, and declining speculative appetite across digital asset markets. As central banks maintain tight monetary conditions and risk assets face renewed scrutiny, Bitcoin’s role as an alternative store of value is being questioned by traditional market voices. Cramer’s comments have reignited debate among investors over whether cryptocurrencies are entering a prolonged consolidation phase or facing deeper structural challenges in a changing financial environment.

A Sharp Turn in Market Sentiment

Jim Cramer’s move to a 100 percent bearish position on Bitcoin has drawn attention across financial markets, given his long-standing influence among retail and institutional investors alike. The declaration signals a broader reassessment of risk assets as volatility persists and global liquidity conditions remain constrained.

Cramer cited weakening momentum and diminished investor enthusiasm as key factors behind his view. His remarks come at a time when digital assets are struggling to reclaim previous highs, despite periodic rallies driven by speculative trading.

Macroeconomic Pressures Weigh on Digital Assets

Bitcoin’s recent performance has been shaped by macroeconomic headwinds, including elevated interest rates and tighter financial conditions. Higher yields on traditional assets have reduced the appeal of non-yielding instruments such as cryptocurrencies, prompting capital to rotate toward safer or income-generating investments.

Market analysts note that inflation dynamics and central bank policy remain critical variables. As long as monetary tightening persists, risk tolerance is expected to stay muted, limiting upside potential for speculative assets.

Regulatory Uncertainty Adds to Investor Caution

Regulatory scrutiny continues to cast a long shadow over the cryptocurrency sector. Policymakers in major economies are advancing frameworks aimed at consumer protection, market transparency, and financial stability, creating uncertainty around compliance costs and operational constraints.
For skeptics like Cramer, the evolving regulatory landscape undermines Bitcoin’s narrative as a decentralized hedge against traditional finance. Instead, regulatory integration is increasingly tying digital assets to the same systemic risks they once claimed to bypass.

Divided Views Within the Investment Community

While Cramer’s bearish stance is unequivocal, it contrasts sharply with the views of long-term Bitcoin proponents who argue that price weakness represents a cyclical correction rather than a fundamental breakdown. Supporters continue to emphasize scarcity, network security, and long-term adoption trends.

The divergence highlights a deepening split between traditional market commentators and crypto-native investors, underscoring Bitcoin’s unresolved identity within the global financial system.

Implications for Investors

Cramer’s comments are unlikely to dictate market direction on their own, but they reflect a broader shift in mainstream sentiment. For investors, the episode serves as a reminder that Bitcoin remains highly sensitive to macroeconomic signals, regulatory developments, and changes in risk appetite.

As digital assets mature, the debate over Bitcoin’s role—speculative instrument, inflation hedge, or alternative asset class—continues. For now, caution appears to be gaining ground among conventional market voices, even as conviction remains strong within the crypto community.

The U.S. Federal Reserve’s outlook for the first quarter of 2026 is emerging as a key variable for Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency market. Expectations around interest rates, liquidity conditions, and inflation management are influencing investor sentiment across digital assets. With monetary policy likely to remain data-dependent, crypto markets are preparing for a period of recalibration rather than speculative acceleration. Analysts suggest that the Fed’s stance could determine whether Bitcoin consolidates as a risk-sensitive asset or regains traction as an alternative store of value. The coming quarter may therefore prove decisive for crypto market direction and capital flows.
Monetary Policy Signals Under Close Watch
As the Federal Reserve outlines its economic priorities for early 2026, market participants are paying close attention to signals on interest rates and balance sheet policy. Even subtle changes in tone can have outsized effects on risk assets, including cryptocurrencies.
If the Fed maintains restrictive conditions to anchor inflation expectations, liquidity across financial markets may remain constrained. This environment historically limits speculative demand, placing downward pressure on volatile assets such as Bitcoin and smaller digital tokens.
Interest Rates and Liquidity Effects on Crypto
Interest rates remain the primary transmission channel between central bank policy and crypto valuations. Higher yields on government bonds and money market instruments reduce the relative attractiveness of non-yielding assets like Bitcoin.
Conversely, any indication of rate stabilization or gradual easing could improve liquidity conditions, encouraging capital to re-enter digital asset markets. Analysts caution, however, that such a shift is unlikely to trigger immediate rallies, given lingering concerns around leverage and market structure.
Bitcoin’s Evolving Market Role
Bitcoin’s sensitivity to macroeconomic conditions has increased as institutional participation has grown. Once viewed primarily as a hedge against monetary debasement, Bitcoin now often trades in correlation with technology equities during periods of tight policy.
The Fed’s Q1 2026 outlook may therefore influence whether Bitcoin behaves more like a high-risk growth asset or reasserts its narrative as a long-term store of value. This identity tension remains unresolved and is central to investor positioning.
Broader Implications for Crypto Markets
Beyond Bitcoin, the Fed’s policy direction will affect the wider crypto ecosystem, including decentralized finance platforms, stablecoins, and blockchain infrastructure projects. Tighter financial conditions could accelerate the market’s shift away from speculative tokens toward assets with clear utility and revenue models.
Stablecoins, in particular, may benefit from demand for low-volatility digital instruments, especially if regulatory clarity improves alongside monetary stability.
A Cautious Road Ahead
The Federal Reserve’s Q1 2026 outlook underscores the growing interdependence between traditional monetary policy and digital asset markets. While cryptocurrencies were once considered insulated from central bank decisions, that assumption no longer holds.
For investors, the message is one of caution and selectivity. The next phase of crypto market evolution is likely to be shaped less by hype and more by macroeconomic discipline, regulatory engagement, and sustainable financial use cases.

Investor sentiment across cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds showed a clear split as Bitcoin and Ether ETFs recorded combined net outflows of Rs. 228 million, while XRP-linked funds remained largely stable. The contrasting performance reflects a cautious market environment shaped by macroeconomic uncertainty, profit-taking, and selective risk appetite. While flagship crypto assets faced withdrawal pressure, the relative resilience of XRP ETFs suggests investors are differentiating between digital assets rather than exiting the sector altogether. The movement in fund flows highlights a maturing investment landscape in which capital allocation is increasingly tactical and driven by asset-specific narratives.

Bitcoin and Ether ETFs Face Withdrawal Pressure

Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds experienced notable net outflows, signaling a pause in investor enthusiasm for the two largest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization. Market participants attributed the Rs. 228 million combined withdrawals to short-term profit-taking and heightened sensitivity to global monetary signals.

These outflows come amid fluctuating price action and renewed caution toward risk assets. Analysts note that ETF investors, often more institutionally oriented, tend to react quickly to macroeconomic developments, adjusting exposure as interest rate expectations and liquidity conditions evolve.

XRP ETFs Show Relative Stability

In contrast, XRP-focused ETFs demonstrated resilience during the same period, holding their ground despite broader market volatility. This stability suggests that investors view XRP’s market dynamics as distinct from those of Bitcoin and Ether.

Some analysts point to XRP’s positioning within cross-border payment narratives and ongoing institutional interest as factors supporting steadier inflows. While volumes remain smaller compared with Bitcoin and Ether funds, the lack of significant outflows highlights selective confidence rather than blanket risk aversion.

Market Sentiment Becomes More Selective

The divergence in ETF flows underscores a shift toward asset-specific evaluation within the crypto investment space. Rather than moving in unison, digital assets are increasingly responding to individual use cases, regulatory developments, and adoption trends.
This selective behavior mirrors patterns seen in traditional equity markets, where sector rotation and differentiated performance are common. For crypto ETFs, it marks a step toward normalization and maturity as investment vehicles.

Institutional Investors Adjust Exposure

Institutional participation has been a key driver of crypto ETF activity, and the recent outflows suggest a recalibration rather than a retreat. Portfolio managers are balancing exposure to volatile assets against broader market risks, particularly in an environment of uncertain monetary policy.

The ability of XRP ETFs to maintain stability may encourage further diversification within crypto portfolios, reducing reliance on Bitcoin and Ether as sole entry points into the digital asset market.

Implications for the Crypto ETF Landscape

The contrasting flows offer insight into evolving investor behavior. Bitcoin and Ether remain foundational assets, but their dominance in ETF allocations is no longer unchallenged. Alternative digital assets with clearer functional narratives are gaining attention during periods of volatility.

As regulatory frameworks and product offerings continue to expand, ETF flows are likely to become a more nuanced indicator of market confidence. For now, the Rs. 228 million outflow serves as a reminder that crypto investment sentiment is becoming more disciplined, selective, and closely tied to broader financial conditions.

The digital asset landscape is expected to undergo a strategic shift in 2026, with stablecoins, blockchain protocols, and cybersecurity infrastructure emerging as primary areas of focus. As Bitcoin and speculative tokens temporarily lose their dominance, attention is turning toward practical use cases, financial stability, and system resilience. Market participants are prioritizing assets and technologies that support payments, settlement efficiency, and risk mitigation rather than price volatility. This transition reflects a maturing ecosystem, shaped by regulatory engagement, institutional participation, and enterprise adoption. The coming year is likely to emphasize function over hype as digital finance integrates more deeply with the global economy.

A Shift Away From Speculation

After years of market cycles driven largely by Bitcoin price movements and token speculation, the digital asset sector is entering a more utilitarian phase. Analysts expect 2026 to mark a period in which infrastructure and reliability take precedence over rapid price appreciation.
Bitcoin and major tokens are not disappearing from relevance, but their role as market bellwethers is diminishing for now. Capital allocation is increasingly influenced by operational value rather than headline-grabbing rallies, signaling a recalibration of investor priorities.
Stablecoins Emerge as Financial Workhorses

Stablecoins are positioned to play a central role in the next phase of digital finance. Pegged to fiat currencies or baskets of assets, these instruments offer price stability while retaining the efficiency of blockchain-based transactions.
Financial institutions and payment providers are exploring stablecoins for cross-border transfers, treasury management, and settlement processes. Their growing adoption reflects demand for faster, lower-cost alternatives to traditional payment rails, particularly in regions where currency volatility or banking friction remains high.

Protocol Development Gains Momentum

Underlying blockchain protocols are also expected to gain prominence in 2026. Developers and investors are directing resources toward scalability, interoperability, and energy efficiency—areas critical for long-term adoption.
Improved protocols enable more complex financial applications, from decentralized lending to tokenized real-world assets. As these systems mature, value creation is shifting from speculative tokens to the foundational layers that support transaction integrity and network performance.

Cybersecurity Becomes a Strategic Imperative

As digital assets move closer to mainstream financial infrastructure, cybersecurity is no longer a secondary concern. High-profile breaches and smart contract vulnerabilities have underscored the financial and reputational risks facing the sector.
In response, organizations are increasing investment in security audits, threat detection, and incident response capabilities. Robust cybersecurity frameworks are increasingly viewed as prerequisites for institutional participation, regulatory approval, and consumer trust.

Regulatory Clarity Shapes the Market

Regulatory engagement is another force driving the shift in focus. Policymakers are prioritizing stablecoins and infrastructure oversight due to their systemic relevance. Clearer rules around reserves, governance, and disclosure are expected to favor compliant issuers and well-architected protocols.

This environment rewards transparency and risk management, further reducing the influence of speculative tokens that lack clear utility or governance structures.

A More Mature Digital Asset Ecosystem

The outlook for 2026 suggests a digital asset market that is evolving beyond its early, volatility-driven phase. Stablecoins, resilient protocols, and strong cybersecurity practices are becoming the pillars of sustainable growth.
For investors and enterprises, the message is clear: the next chapter of digital finance will be defined less by dramatic price swings and more by infrastructure that delivers real-world efficiency, stability, and trust.

Dogecoin may be entering a familiar phase, according to market analysts who argue that current price behavior mirrors the accumulation cycle observed in 2020. The pattern is characterized by extended periods of consolidation, subdued volatility, and gradual capital buildup ahead of potential momentum shifts. While no outcome is guaranteed, the comparison has renewed debate around Dogecoin’s cyclical nature and its sensitivity to sentiment-driven inflows. Analysts caution that broader market conditions, liquidity trends, and macroeconomic factors will ultimately determine whether history repeats itself or diverges in a more mature and selective crypto environment.

Signs of a Renewed Accumulation Phase

Technical analysts studying Dogecoin’s recent price structure point to similarities with its behavior roughly five years ago. During that earlier period, DOGE traded within a narrow range for months, marked by declining volumes and limited speculative interest.

Current market data suggests a comparable setup, with price action stabilizing after prolonged corrections. Such accumulation phases are typically interpreted as periods when long-term participants gradually build positions while short-term traders exit due to lack of volatility.

Lessons From the 2020 Cycle

In 2020, Dogecoin’s accumulation phase preceded a sharp expansion in trading activity the following year, driven largely by retail enthusiasm and social momentum. While the circumstances today differ significantly, the historical parallel has attracted attention among traders seeking early signals of a potential trend shift.

Analysts emphasize, however, that the 2020 rally occurred in an environment of abundant liquidity and rising risk appetite. Replicating those conditions would require supportive macroeconomic factors that are not currently guaranteed.

Market Structure Has Evolved

Unlike 2020, the current crypto market is more institutionalized and closely tied to global financial conditions. Dogecoin now trades within a more complex ecosystem that includes regulated investment products, stricter compliance standards, and heightened regulatory scrutiny.
This evolution may dampen the magnitude of any future rally, even if accumulation patterns persist. Market participants are increasingly discerning, focusing on liquidity depth and risk management rather than purely narrative-driven trades.

Sentiment and Community Influence Remain Key

Despite structural changes, Dogecoin’s market identity remains closely linked to sentiment and community engagement. Social activity, public endorsements, and cultural relevance continue to play an outsized role in shaping short-term price movements.

Analysts note that accumulation phases often coincide with reduced public attention, a condition that historically has preceded renewed interest. Whether such interest returns at scale will depend on broader market psychology.

A Cautious Outlook for Investors

While comparisons to past cycles provide useful context, analysts stress the importance of caution. Historical patterns offer perspective, not certainty, particularly in an asset class as volatile as cryptocurrency.

For investors, the current phase may represent a period of strategic observation rather than aggressive positioning. If Dogecoin is indeed repeating its 2020 accumulation cycle, confirmation would likely come gradually, shaped by liquidity conditions, sentiment shifts, and the evolving role of meme-based assets in a more mature crypto market.

China has launched a new wave of state-backed venture capital funds aimed at channeling investment into so-called “hard technology” sectors, underscoring Beijing’s push to strengthen technological self-reliance. The initiative targets capital-intensive and strategically critical industries such as semiconductors, advanced manufacturing, artificial intelligence, and next-generation materials. By mobilizing long-term funding and reducing reliance on foreign technology, the program reflects a shift toward patient capital and industrial upgrading. The move also highlights China’s intent to reshape its venture ecosystem, prioritizing deep innovation over short-term returns as global technological competition intensifies.

A Strategic Push Toward Deep Innovation

Chinese authorities have introduced new venture capital vehicles designed to support “hard technology,” a term used to describe foundational, research-driven industries with long development cycles. Unlike consumer internet startups, these sectors require sustained investment, technical expertise, and policy coordination.

The funds are expected to operate with longer time horizons, allowing companies to focus on research, commercialization, and scale without immediate pressure for rapid exits. This approach aligns with national objectives to build resilient industrial supply chains.

Target Sectors and Investment Priorities

The newly launched funds are directed toward areas considered critical to economic security and future competitiveness. These include semiconductor design and manufacturing, high-end equipment, industrial software, clean energy technologies, and advanced materials.
By concentrating capital in these domains, policymakers aim to address structural gaps that have historically constrained domestic innovation. Analysts note that such investments are intended not only to support startups but also to strengthen mid-stage firms transitioning from research to mass production.

State Capital and Market Discipline

While the funds are state-backed, officials have emphasized the importance of professional management and market-oriented decision-making. The goal is to blend public capital with private expertise, reducing inefficiencies often associated with purely administrative allocation.

This hybrid model reflects lessons from earlier investment programs, where excessive intervention sometimes distorted incentives. Greater accountability and performance metrics are expected to guide capital deploymet.

Implications for the Venture Capital Landscape

The initiative is likely to reshape China’s venture capital ecosystem by shifting focus away from short-cycle consumer platforms toward industrial and scientific innovation. Private investors may follow state capital into hard technology sectors, benefiting from risk-sharing and policy support.

However, analysts caution that success will depend on governance, transparency, and the ability to attract top technical talent. Without these elements, capital alone may not translate into meaningful breakthroughs.

Global Context and Economic Significance

China’s move comes amid heightened global competition over advanced technology and increasing scrutiny of cross-border tech flows. By strengthening domestic funding channels, Beijing aims to insulate key industries from external shocks and geopolitical constraints.

The rollout of hard technology venture funds signals a long-term strategy: prioritizing technological depth, resilience, and strategic autonomy over rapid financial returns. As global innovation races intensify, this approach could play a decisive role in shaping China’s industrial future.

Mits Healthcare Charts Ambitious Growth Path Ahead of Public Market Debut Tushar Sharma Fri, 26 Dec 2025 - 17:44

KNR Constructions Withdraws From Four Highway Projects, Signals Strategic Recalibration Gurjot Singh Fri, 26 Dec 2025 - 17:40

India’s Auto Industry Poised for Steady Growth and Structural Shift in 2026 Gurjot Singh Fri, 26 Dec 2025 - 17:38

India’s Auto Market Braces for a Wave of New Model Launches in 2026 Binnypriya Singh Fri, 26 Dec 2025 - 17:32