India’s Aircraft Fleet Poised to Triple by 2035, Airbus Projects Eknath Deshpande Sat, 31 Jan 2026 - 15:27

Brigade Hotel Ventures Posts Higher Q3 Profit on Strong Hospitality Demand Tushar Sharma Sat, 31 Jan 2026 - 15:27

Piramal Pharma Posts Rs 136-Crore Q3 Loss as Inventory Issues Weigh on Earnings Tushar Sharma Sat, 31 Jan 2026 - 15:27

Oswal Greenzo Secures 5 MW Green Hydrogen Project, Strengthening Clean Energy Push Eknath Deshpande Sat, 31 Jan 2026 - 15:27

Airtel and Adobe Partner to Offer Free Adobe Express Premium Access Binnypriya Singh Sat, 31 Jan 2026 - 15:27

Maruti Suzuki Shares Slide After Q3 Results Raise Margin Concerns Gurjot Singh Sat, 31 Jan 2026 - 15:27

Markets Turn Cautious Ahead of Union Budget as Investors Trim Risk Gurjot Singh Sat, 31 Jan 2026 - 15:27

HDFC Capital Launches Rs 1,000-Crore Platform to Transform India’s Rental Housing Market Tushar Sharma Sat, 31 Jan 2026 - 15:27

A prominent cryptocurrency infrastructure company has filed plans to establish an artificial intelligence (AI) computing facility near Pangborn, Washington, reflecting a broader industry shift toward high‑performance computing (HPC) and AI workloads. The proposed development would leverage existing data centre assets, including inexpensive electricity and established grid connections, to support energy‑intensive AI applications. This move underscores digital infrastructure firms’ efforts to diversify beyond traditional blockchain mining as profitability pressures and market demand evolve. Industry observers view the initiative as part of a larger trend in which former crypto‑centric sites are reconfigured to serve AI and cloud computing markets, potentially boosting local economic activity and technological relevance.

Background: From Crypto Mining to AI Infrastructure
Central Washington has long attracted digital infrastructure investments due to its abundant hydroelectric power, which historically drew cryptocurrency miners seeking low‑cost energy for server operations. Over time, multiple operators developed data centre campuses in the region capable of supporting thousands of servers. These facilities have become attractive candidates for repurposing or expanding into high‑performance and AI computing due to their existing power infrastructure and cooling capabilities.

The Proposed AI Facility Near Pangborn
The company behind the application plans to convert or build out part of its data infrastructure near Pangborn to host AI workloads. This type of facility is designed to support advanced computing tasks that require significant processing power — particularly those involving machine learning training and inference — which is markedly different from the repetitive algorithm calculations typical of cryptocurrency mining. The applicant seeks local planning approval and environmental clearance as part of the initial steps in the project review process.

While specific project specifications have not been publicly detailed, the focus on AI and HPC reflects commercial demand for specialised computing capacity capable of handling next‑generation workloads.

Strategic Drivers: Profitability and Market Demand
The pivot toward AI computing aligns with a broader trend in the digital infrastructure industry. Firms that historically relied on revenue from blockchain mining are increasingly exploring or actively transitioning existing assets toward AI and HPC workloads. This trend is driven by several factors:

Economics of Mining: Traditional cryptocurrency mining profitability can be highly cyclical and dependent on asset prices, network difficulty, and energy costs.

AI Demand Growth: The rise of generative AI and large language models has propelled demand for specialised data centre infrastructure, with many companies willing to pay premiums for GPU‑dense computing capacity.

Asset Utilisation: Data centres originally built for crypto operations already feature robust power feeds and cooling systems, making them suitable for repurposing to host AI workloads with comparatively modest additional capital investment.

Local and Regional Economic Considerations
If approved, the proposed AI facility could bring notable economic benefits to the Pangborn area. Construction activity typically generates temporary employment, and long‑term operations may support specialised technical jobs and service contracts. Moreover, increased utilisation of existing electrical and fibre infrastructure could enhance the attractiveness of the region to other high‑tech investments.

However, community stakeholders and local authorities often weigh such proposals against potential challenges, including increased power demand, land‑use concerns, and broader infrastructure impacts. Experience from other rural and semi‑rural communities demonstrates that transparent planning and public engagement are crucial to aligning economic ambitions with residents’ quality‑of‑life considerations.

Broader Industry Context: Crypto Meets AI
The Pangborn initiative reflects a widespread reorientation within the digital infrastructure sector. Companies like Bitfarms are already converting Bitcoin mining sites in Washington to support HPC and AI workloads, with projects targeting completion in 2026 and backed by substantial investment agreements for specialised hardware and cooling systems.

This strategic realignment highlights how crypto‑origin infrastructure can adapt to the growing computing needs of AI, cloud and enterprise markets. As demand for machine intelligence expands, so too does competition among data centre operators to secure capacity hosting deals and long‑term contracts with major technology firms.

Conclusion: A Strategic Evolution for Digital Infrastructure
The application to develop an AI computing facility near Pangborn illustrates the evolving priorities of digital infrastructure companies navigating a changing market landscape. By building on existing power and data assets, the industry aims to capture new revenue streams tied to AI and HPC demand, while potentially enhancing regional economic prospects. For local officials and investors alike, the success of such projects will hinge on effective planning, community collaboration, and alignment with broader technological trends shaping the future of computing.

Title: Australian Regulator Imposes A$14 Million Fine on Qoin Provider for Misleading Crypto Conduct
Summary (100 words)
Australia’s financial regulator has secured a decisive legal victory against the operator of the Qoin cryptocurrency and its associated wallet, resulting in a A$14 million (about US$9.6 million) fine for misleading conduct and unlicensed financial services activity. The Federal Court found that the company behind Qoin made materially inaccurate claims about the token’s usability, regulatory status, and merchant acceptance, exposing consumers to undue risk. The ruling also includes a decade‑long prohibition on unlicensed financial activity and orders for corrective disclosures. The case marks a significant enforcement action in global cryptocurrency regulation, reinforcing authorities’ commitment to transparency and investor protection in digital asset markets.

Regulatory Enforcement and Court Findings
Australia’s Federal Court upheld allegations that the operator of Qoin engaged in prolonged unlicensed financial services conduct and disseminated misleading information about its cryptocurrency product. The court determined that the company lacked the requisite Australian Financial Services Licence while offering and promoting the Qoin Wallet, in violation of the Corporations Act.

Justice Wendy Downes described the conduct as “serious and unlawful,” highlighting the absence of adequate compliance systems despite clear regulatory obligations. The ruling underscores the importance of licensing and accurate disclosure where financial products are marketed to retail users.

Misleading Representations and Consumer Risk
At the center of the case were representations that Qoin tokens could be readily exchanged for fiat currency or other digital assets and that they were widely accepted by merchants — assertions the court found to be inaccurate or unsubstantiated. These claims, coupled with the absence of clear risk disclosures, were judged likely to mislead consumers into overestimating the asset’s liquidity and practical utility.

Regulators emphasised that the lack of transparent risk communication endangered users, particularly those with limited understanding of the complex, high‑volatility nature of cryptocurrencies. The court’s findings serve as a cautionary reminder that claims about digital assets must be grounded in verifiable facts.

Breakdown of the Penalty and Associated Orders
The A$14 million penalty encompasses financial punishments and remedial obligations designed to deter future misconduct:

A financial penalty of A$14 million, reflecting the duration and severity of the breaches.

A 10‑year prohibition against providing financial services without a licence.

Mandatory cessation of false or misleading promotional claims, including statements about user numbers, token convertibility, and regulatory status.

Corrective disclosures to be published on platforms associated with the Qoin Wallet to counter prior misrepresentations.

An order for the company to pay a significant portion of the regulator’s legal costs.

These measures aim to rectify past harm and establish clear expectations for future compliance.

Broader Implications for Crypto Market Regulation
ASIC Chair Joe Longo stressed that the ruling reinforces the principle that digital asset services must comply with the same legal standards as traditional financial products when targeting retail investors. The case aligns with a broader global regulatory trend emphasizing investor protection, accurate disclosures, and accountability.

Analysts see the penalty as indicative of regulators’ growing willingness to confront non‑compliant actors in the crypto space, a development likely to influence corporate behaviour and investor confidence. Firms operating digital asset products are now under heightened scrutiny to align marketing language, licensing practices, and risk communication with established financial laws.

Investor Takeaways and Future Outlook
For investors and market participants, the Qoin ruling highlights the importance of due diligence and regulatory awareness. As digital assets become more integrated into mainstream financial frameworks, the need for clear, accurate information and lawful conduct grows ever more vital.

While innovative technologies continue to reshape financial services, regulators’ enforcement actions serve as a reminder that investor protection, transparency, and compliance remain foundational to sustainable market development.

Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, recently dipped to its lowest level in about one month, reflecting persistent volatility and cautious investor sentiment across digital asset markets. The retreat came amid broader market uncertainty, risk-off positioning, and ongoing liquidations in leveraged crypto positions. Analysts say that despite occasional rebounds, technical headwinds and macroeconomic factors continue to influence price dynamics, keeping traders vigilant. Other major cryptocurrencies also experienced price fluctuations, underscoring the interconnected nature of the crypto ecosystem. As investors reassess risk and seek clearer price trends, short-term volatility is expected to persist even as long-term fundamentals remain a topic of debate among market participants.

Renewed Downward Pressure on Bitcoin
Bitcoin’s price recently slid to a near one-month low as crypto markets extended their recent sell-off, reflecting a broader pause in bullish momentum. Persistent uncertainty around investor positioning and market catalysts has contributed to heightened caution among traders. The dip underscored how quickly sentiment can shift in an asset class known for sharp price swings.

Market Dynamics and Liquidations
The latest slide in Bitcoin’s price was accompanied by notable liquidations in leveraged trading positions, as risk-off sentiment rippled through crypto markets. These forced closures can exacerbate downward moves when markets lack strong buying support at key technical levels. Such dynamics often emerge during periods of heightened risk aversion or macroeconomic reevaluations.

Broader Crypto Price Action
Although Bitcoin’s dip has drawn the most attention, other major cryptocurrencies also experienced volatility. Ether and leading altcoins have seen mixed price movements as market participants reassess positions and liquidity conditions. This correlation highlights the intertwined nature of digital assets, where stress in Bitcoin often translates to broader market retracement.

Technical and Macro Headwinds
Technical analysts point to Bitcoin’s recent price structure as indicative of near-term strain, with resistance levels proving difficult to breach and support zones under pressure. Macro factors — including shifting investor risk preferences and broader financial market volatility — continue to influence digital asset flows, aligning crypto performance more closely with traditional risk assets.

Investor Sentiment and Near-Term Outlook
While the short-term trend reflects caution, many market participants monitor key technical thresholds for potential stabilization or rebound signals. Traders often look to support zones and sentiment indicators to gauge whether a temporary sell-off presents buying opportunities or signals deeper corrective pressure ahead. As always, risk management and diversification remain critical in navigating the still-evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

The White House is preparing to convene leaders from major banking institutions and cryptocurrency firms in an effort to bridge regulatory divides and shape a cohesive legislative framework for digital assets. The discussions aim to balance financial innovation with consumer protection, financial stability and anti-money laundering safeguards. As crypto adoption expands and traditional finance deepens its exposure to blockchain-based services, policymakers face mounting pressure to deliver regulatory clarity. The proposed dialogue signals a shift toward collaboration rather than confrontation, with lawmakers seeking practical solutions that integrate emerging technologies into the broader financial system without undermining oversight or systemic resilience.

A Push for Regulatory Alignment
Senior policymakers are moving to facilitate discussions between established financial institutions and the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency sector. The objective is to narrow policy gaps that have created uncertainty for investors, businesses and regulators alike.
Digital assets have grown from speculative instruments into a multi-trillion-dollar global ecosystem influencing payments, capital markets and financial infrastructure. However, regulatory approaches have remained fragmented, often placing traditional banks and crypto-native firms under different compliance expectations. The planned talks aim to promote consistency and reduce legal ambiguity.

Why the Dialogue Matters Now
Momentum for legislative clarity has intensified as more banks explore custody services, tokenisation initiatives and blockchain-based settlement systems. At the same time, crypto firms seek clearer pathways to operate within existing financial laws without stifling innovation.
Lawmakers are increasingly aware that regulatory uncertainty can push activity into less transparent jurisdictions, raising concerns about investor protection and financial crime. A coordinated framework could help ensure that innovation develops within a system that safeguards consumers and preserves market integrity.

Key Issues on the Table
Consumer and Investor Protection
One of the central goals of the discussions is strengthening safeguards for retail and institutional investors. Market volatility, platform failures and fraud cases have highlighted the need for clearer disclosure standards, custody requirements and operational resilience.

Financial Stability
Regulators are examining how digital assets intersect with traditional financial systems. Stablecoins, tokenised deposits and crypto-linked investment products have introduced new channels of risk transmission. Policymakers want to ensure that innovation does not create vulnerabilities similar to those seen in past financial crises.

Anti-Money Laundering Compliance
Banks operate under strict anti-money laundering and know-your-customer rules, while crypto platforms have historically faced uneven enforcement. Harmonising compliance expectations is expected to be a major focus, particularly as cross-border transactions increase.

Jurisdictional Clarity
A persistent challenge in digital asset oversight is determining which agencies supervise various segments of the market. The anticipated discussions may contribute to clearer boundaries between securities, commodities and payment regulations, reducing overlapping authority.

Industry Perspectives
Banking institutions generally support clear regulatory guardrails that allow them to participate in digital asset markets without breaching prudential rules. Many see blockchain technology as a tool for improving efficiency in payments, trade finance and securities settlement.
Crypto firms, meanwhile, have argued that outdated regulations do not always align with decentralised technologies. They are expected to advocate for tailored rules that recognise the technical differences between blockchain-based systems and traditional financial intermediaries.

Toward a Legislative Compromise
The White House’s role as a convener signals an effort to move beyond adversarial debates and toward practical policymaking. By bringing both sides to the table, officials hope to craft legislation that supports innovation while maintaining oversight standards expected of the financial system.

A compromise framework could provide long-awaited certainty for markets, encouraging responsible investment and technological development. It may also help position the United States as a competitive hub for financial innovation, rather than a jurisdiction defined by regulatory ambiguity.

Conclusion
As digital assets continue reshaping global finance, collaboration between policymakers, banks and crypto firms is becoming increasingly essential. The forthcoming discussions represent a pivotal step toward integrating emerging technologies into established financial structures. Striking the right balance between innovation and regulation will determine whether the digital asset economy matures into a stable component of the broader financial landscape or remains constrained by uncertainty.

Cryptocurrency investing in India has evolved from a niche interest into a mainstream financial trend, particularly among younger investors. With increasing participation from Gen Z and millennials, digital assets are becoming a notable component of diversified portfolios. While the market offers significant growth potential, round-the-clock trading and innovative earning mechanisms, it also carries substantial risks. Regulatory uncertainty, high taxation and fraud remain key concerns for participants.

Understanding the balance between opportunity and exposure is critical for investors navigating India’s rapidly developing crypto ecosystem, where informed decision-making, risk management and long-term strategy determine sustainable financial outcomes.

The Rise of Crypto Investing in India
India has emerged as one of the fastest-growing cryptocurrency markets, driven largely by tech-savvy young investors and expanding digital infrastructure. The appeal lies in the accessibility of crypto platforms, low entry barriers and the perception of high-growth opportunities compared with traditional asset classes.

Unlike conventional investments, cryptocurrencies are part of a global financial ecosystem powered by blockchain technology. This has encouraged Indian investors to explore digital assets not only for speculation but also as a component of diversified, multi-asset portfolios.

Key Advantages of Cryptocurrency Investment

High Growth Potential
Cryptocurrencies are known for rapid price movements, which can create opportunities for significant returns. Market expansion, institutional interest and increasing retail participation have added liquidity and depth to the ecosystem. Beyond simple buying and selling, investors can explore earning models such as staking and decentralised finance participation, which offer additional income avenues.

24/7 Market Access
Crypto markets operate continuously without closing hours. This round-the-clock structure allows investors to respond instantly to global developments, offering flexibility unavailable in traditional equity or commodity markets.

Decentralisation and Financial Autonomy
Blockchain networks function without central authorities, reducing reliance on intermediaries such as banks or brokers. This structure promotes peer-to-peer transactions and gives users greater control over their assets. However, decentralisation does not eliminate regulatory influence or market risks.

Transparency and Traceability
Transactions on most blockchain networks are recorded on public ledgers, allowing verification and improving accountability. This technological transparency enhances trust in transaction records, even though user identities may remain pseudonymous.

Inflation Hedge Characteristics
Certain cryptocurrencies are designed with fixed or predictable supply models. Bitcoin, for example, has a capped supply, which supporters argue may offer protection against long-term currency depreciation. In contrast, assets with controlled issuance still maintain transparent supply mechanisms that influence pricing dynamics.

Portfolio Diversification
The crypto ecosystem includes a wide range of assets, from established cryptocurrencies to stablecoins and decentralised finance tokens. Exposure to multiple categories allows investors to diversify across technology use cases, market capitalisations and risk levels.

Major Risks and Challenges
Regulatory Uncertainty
Cryptocurrencies are not recognised as legal tender in India, and regulatory frameworks continue to evolve. Policy changes could affect exchange operations, investor protections and market participation. This uncertainty remains one of the biggest structural risks for the sector.

High Tax Burden
Crypto profits in India are subject to a flat 30 percent tax, along with 1 percent tax deducted at source on transactions. Additionally, losses cannot be offset against other income or carried forward, reducing flexibility for active traders and long-term investors alike.

Fraud and Security Threats
The global crypto market has seen a rise in scams, including fake investment schemes, phishing attacks and fraudulent trading platforms. Increasing technological sophistication has made fraud more difficult to detect, placing responsibility on investors to conduct due diligence and use reputable platforms.

Banking and Payment Constraints
Some financial institutions remain cautious about crypto-related transactions due to compliance obligations and risk exposure. This can create friction in fund transfers between bank accounts and crypto exchanges, limiting ease of access for certain investors.

Extreme Volatility
Sharp price swings are a defining feature of the cryptocurrency market. Emotional decision-making, overexposure and speculative trading often lead to substantial losses. Without disciplined risk management, volatility can outweigh potential gains.

Strategic Considerations for Investors
Cryptocurrency investing requires a different mindset from traditional markets. Investors should prioritise research, diversification and position sizing aligned with their financial goals and risk tolerance. Long-term strategies tend to reduce the impact of short-term volatility, while proper security practices — such as using trusted platforms and safeguarding digital wallets — are essential.

Conclusion
Cryptocurrency presents both compelling opportunities and serious risks for Indian investors. While the market offers innovation, accessibility and potential high returns, it is equally shaped by uncertainty, taxation challenges and security concerns. A balanced, informed approach — supported by prudent risk management — is crucial for navigating this evolving asset class. In India’s fast-changing financial landscape, knowledge and caution remain the most valuable investment tools.

Bazaar has unveiled ORC-55, a new multi-chain cryptocurrency token standard designed to improve interoperability, scalability and cross-network functionality in the digital asset ecosystem. The initiative aims to simplify how tokens operate across multiple blockchains, addressing long-standing fragmentation challenges in decentralized finance and Web3 applications. Bazaar’s native BZR token is the first to adopt the ORC-55 framework, serving as a live demonstration of the standard’s capabilities. Industry observers view the launch as a strategic step toward more seamless blockchain integration, potentially enhancing liquidity, developer efficiency and user accessibility across decentralized platforms and financial networks worldwide.

Addressing Blockchain Fragmentation
The rapid expansion of blockchain networks has created a diverse but fragmented ecosystem where assets often remain confined to individual chains. ORC-55 is positioned as a solution to this limitation by enabling tokens to function natively across multiple blockchain environments without requiring complex bridging mechanisms.
Developers familiar with cross-chain infrastructure say such standards could reduce operational friction and lower security risks associated with traditional token bridges. By embedding interoperability at the protocol level, ORC-55 aims to streamline asset transfers and smart contract execution across networks.

Technical Vision Behind ORC-55
According to Bazaar, ORC-55 introduces a unified token architecture that supports cross-chain compatibility, standardized metadata and flexible deployment layers. This framework is designed to ensure that tokens maintain consistent identity and functionality, regardless of the blockchain on which they operate.

The approach reflects a broader industry trend toward modular blockchain development, where assets and applications are no longer restricted by single-network constraints. Analysts note that such adaptability could help decentralized applications scale more efficiently while offering users smoother transaction experiences.

BZR Token as a Live Demonstration
Bazaar’s BZR token serves as the inaugural implementation of ORC-55, providing a practical example of the standard in action. By launching BZR under the new framework, Bazaar aims to validate the technical robustness of the protocol while encouraging other projects to adopt similar cross-chain models.

Early adopters suggest that multi-chain compatibility may enhance liquidity by allowing assets to interact with broader decentralized finance ecosystems. This could also reduce barriers for developers seeking to build applications that span multiple blockchain networks.

Implications for Decentralized Finance
The introduction of ORC-55 may influence how decentralized finance platforms approach asset integration. Cross-chain tokens can potentially enable more efficient capital flows, broader market participation and improved resilience across blockchain ecosystems.

Financial analysts observe that interoperability remains one of the sector’s most critical challenges. A widely adopted standard could reduce duplication of infrastructure and foster more collaborative development across networks, accelerating the evolution of Web3 financial services.

Competitive Landscape and Industry Response
As blockchain ecosystems compete for developer adoption and user activity, standards that simplify integration can provide a strategic advantage. ORC-55 enters a landscape where several interoperability solutions are already under development, each with different architectural approaches.

Market participants will likely assess ORC-55 based on scalability, security and real-world adoption. The success of the standard may depend on how quickly exchanges, wallets and decentralized applications integrate support for its framework.

Outlook for Multi-Chain Standards
The launch of ORC-55 signals growing momentum behind multi-chain innovation. As blockchain networks continue to proliferate, interoperability standards are becoming essential infrastructure rather than optional enhancements.

If ORC-55 achieves broad adoption, it could contribute to a more unified digital asset environment where users interact with decentralized services without needing to navigate underlying technical complexities. Such developments may ultimately bring blockchain technology closer to mainstream financial integration.

As India approaches Budget 2026, the cryptocurrency sector is intensifying its appeal for regulatory and tax clarity to foster innovation while ensuring compliance. Industry stakeholders argue that the current framework, marked by high tax rates and complex reporting rules, has constrained domestic growth and driven trading activity offshore. Policymakers now face mounting pressure to simplify taxation, rationalize transaction levies, and introduce clearer definitions for digital assets. The upcoming budget is widely viewed as a pivotal opportunity to balance revenue considerations with technological advancement, investor protection, and India’s broader ambition to position itself as a global hub for digital finance.

Growing Demand for Tax Reform
India’s digital asset ecosystem has matured rapidly, encompassing exchanges, blockchain developers, Web3 startups and retail investors. However, industry participants contend that the existing tax regime remains one of the most stringent globally. The flat 30 percent tax on virtual digital asset gains, combined with a 1 percent tax deducted at source (TDS) on transactions, has significantly reduced trading volumes on domestic platforms.
Market observers note that while the measures were introduced to improve traceability and prevent illicit use, they have also increased compliance burdens and encouraged a migration of activity to overseas exchanges. Budget 2026 is therefore seen as a crucial juncture to recalibrate the system without diluting oversight.

Simplifying Compliance Frameworks
A central industry request is the simplification of compliance requirements. Startups and investors alike argue that overlapping reporting obligations, ambiguous definitions and the lack of loss-offset provisions create operational uncertainty.
Experts suggest that streamlining disclosure norms, clarifying classification standards and introducing standardized accounting guidelines for digital assets could reduce friction while maintaining regulatory control. A more predictable compliance structure would also help traditional financial institutions engage more confidently with blockchain-related businesses.

Rationalizing Transaction Taxes
The 1 percent TDS on crypto transactions has been widely criticized for affecting liquidity. Because the tax applies on the gross transaction value rather than net gains, high-frequency traders and market makers have found it particularly difficult to operate efficiently.

Industry representatives are urging the government to reduce the TDS rate to a minimal threshold or limit its applicability to certain transaction sizes. A recalibrated approach, analysts say, could restore trading activity within India’s regulated ecosystem and improve transparency through higher onshore participation.

Balancing Revenue and Innovation
From the government’s perspective, cryptocurrency taxation remains a complex balancing act. Digital assets represent a new and evolving revenue stream, but excessive taxation risks stifling innovation and pushing entrepreneurs to more favorable jurisdictions.
A moderate policy shift in Budget 2026 could signal that India aims to nurture emerging financial technologies while maintaining fiscal discipline. Economists argue that a broader tax base, supported by higher participation and clearer rules, may ultimately generate more sustainable long-term revenue than restrictive measures.

Global Context and Competitive Pressures
Several major economies are refining their digital asset regulations to attract blockchain investment. Jurisdictions in Europe, the Middle East and parts of Asia have introduced structured licensing frameworks and more nuanced tax policies.
India’s approach in Budget 2026 will therefore be closely watched by global investors assessing the country’s competitiveness in the digital economy. A progressive yet prudent tax structure could enhance India’s standing as a technology-driven financial hub.

Outlook for the Sector
While expectations remain cautious, industry leaders are hopeful that policymakers will use Budget 2026 to bring greater coherence to crypto taxation. Clearer guidelines, rationalized rates and simplified compliance could revive domestic trading volumes, stimulate innovation and improve regulatory oversight.

Ultimately, the decisions made in the upcoming budget may determine whether India emerges as a leader in digital finance or continues to see capital and talent flow to more accommodating markets.

India–EU Trade Pact Spurs Two-Wheeler Makers to Target European Markets Tinku Bhatia Fri, 30 Jan 2026 - 17:51

TVS Supply Chain Expands Footprint with Acquisition of Swamy and Sons 3PL Kirti Srinivasan Fri, 30 Jan 2026 - 15:51

ED Attaches Reliance Group Assets Worth Rs. 1,800 Crore Amid Ongoing Investigation Vinod Pathak Fri, 30 Jan 2026 - 15:51

Mahindra Finance Q3 Profit Declines 10% to Rs. 826 Crore Amid Margin Pressures Gurleen Bajwa Fri, 30 Jan 2026 - 15:51

SBI Life Q3 Profit Rises 5% to Rs. 577 Crore on Steady Premium Growth Agamveer Singh Fri, 30 Jan 2026 - 15:51