The authorities in the United States have said that they do not wish to comment on an internal matter of India, but only said that the allowing Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the retail sector in the country would benefit farmers as well other citizens.

Robert D Hormats, the Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment said that, "I think they have to work through their domestic political process and I don't want to comment on their internal affairs at this point."

Those who favor the deal argue that it will address the issue of supply bottle necks, develop supply chain infrastructure, reduce wastage of food and improve efficiency, besides generating employment. They also say that it will benefit farmers, who will be able to negotiate better deals with large firms and ultimately, customers, who will get commodities at a cheaper price.

Opponents argue that the allowing big international players will affect small retailers, which dot the country’s streets. They cite the examples of Thailand and Malaysia, which allowing FDI in retail has resulted in problems for small retailers.

The union cabinet’s decision to allow FDI in single brand retail sector has been opposed severely by several sections political as well as social setup in the country. The central government has also said that individual states will be allowed to veto foreign retailers. The chief ministers of Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Bihar have vowed not to allow FDI in their respective states.

The ruling congress party is concerned as the opposition to the FDI not only comes from its main rival BJP but also others like AIADMK chief J Jayalalithaa, Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee and BSP chief Mayawati. The tree women Chief Ministers will have toe power to veto the entry of foreign firms into their states.

Opposition leaders now say that the finance minister, Pranab Mukherjee has agreed to delay the decision to allow FDI in retail in the country.